Service
Software Testing
A test strategy and suite built for your actual codebase, not a generic checklist -- automated where automation pays off.
Automated coverage is only valuable if it’s testing the paths that actually matter to the business – not the easiest ones to write assertions for. We start every engagement by prioritizing risk, then build automation where it pays for itself and keep manual exploratory testing where it doesn’t.
What's included
- Test strategy
- An audit of what's covered today and what isn't, prioritized by the actual cost of each path breaking in production -- not by how easy it is to test.
- Automation
- End-to-end and integration tests built for the paths that matter, wired into CI so a failing test blocks a merge instead of reaching production.
- Manual & exploratory testing
- Structured exploratory sessions on new features before release, catching the edge cases automation is bad at finding.
- Reporting
- Clear, actionable defect reports -- reproduction steps, environment, severity -- not a spreadsheet of vague complaints.
Questions we get asked
Can you test a codebase you didn't build?
Yes -- most testing engagements are exactly that. We start with an audit so the plan reflects the codebase as it actually is.
Do you do manual QA, or only automation?
Both. Automation is where it earns its cost -- regression-prone, high-traffic paths -- and structured manual testing covers the rest.
Ready to talk about software testing?
Tell us the shape of the problem -- we'll come back with a scoped proposal, not a generic pitch.